Case Law › High Court › Satara v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

Satara v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court 25 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

25 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Satara v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7726 OF 2006 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7728 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 7726 OF 2006 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7728 OF 2006 The United Western Bank Ltd. Satara ... Petitioner Versus The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. S.N. Inamdar with Mr. A.K. Jasani for Petitioner. Mr. B.M. Chatterji for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2008 R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2008 P.C. P.C. . The Petitioners have filed appeals in which question of law as raised in these petitions has also been raised. Considering the same, it is open to the Petitioners to raise the said questions in the appeals which are pending. The present petitions which are directed against Misc. order become infructuous. Accordingly the same are disposed of. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.