Sathappan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
High Court
27 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Sathappan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
27 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Sathappan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:27.03.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
Writ Petition (MD)No.8984 of 2011andM.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012
Sathappan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. Income Tax Officer, Ward No.1(3), Arunachalam Chettiar Street, Karaikudi.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle II, C.R.Buildings, VP.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai.
... Respondents
Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directingthe respondents to grant exemption under Section 10(10C) ofIncome Tax Act as requested by the petitioner (PAN No. is AVT PS5547 E) in his request dated 15.12.2006 and receipt dated27.01.2011 in respect of Assessment Year 2004-2005. For petitioner : Ms.M.RajeswariFor Respondents : Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy
ORDER
The issue involved in this writ petition is related tothe claim of exemption under Section 10(10C) of Income Tax Act.The petitioner, by representations dated 15.12.2006 and27.01.2011, sought exemption in respect of the Assessment Year2004-2005 which was not considered by the authority and hence heis before this Court.
2. The Income Tax Department denying the claim of thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioner filed the counter affidavit stating that the requesthas not been considered since the issue is a debatable one.
2
3. On the other hand, the issue is covered by thedecision of this Court in W.P.Nos.3986 to 1997 of 2007 etc.batch, by order dated 03.11.2010 and in Writ Appeal Nos.1098 to1155 of 2011 dated 12.11.2011, wherein the Division Bench hasconsidered the similar claim and directed the respondents togrant exemption under Section 10(10C) of Income Tax Act as perthe decision of the Apex Court in S.L.P.Nos.6997 to 7002 of 2009dated 21.10.2009 and subsequently, the direction was alsocomplied. Since the petitioner is similarly placed and theprayer sought for in the writ petition also similar in nature,the writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed togrant exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act andpass appropriate orders as indicated above. No costs. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(W)
/True Copy/
To
Sub Assistant Registrar
1. Income Tax Officer, Ward No.1(3), Arunachalam Chettiar Street,Karaikudi.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle II, C.R.Buildings, VP.Rathinasamy Nadar Road,Madurai.
+1cc to M/s. S.M.S.Johnny Basha Advocate Sr.No.19103/14akv AA/08.05.2014/2p- 4c/
Writ Petition(MD)No.8984 of 2011
27.03.2014
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.