Case Law › High Court › Satish Kumar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward

Satish Kumar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward

High Court 25 Feb 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

25 Feb 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Satish Kumar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: He prays to withdraw the present appeal.| 2 The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 254 case law →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH, ITA No.35 of 2012 (O&M)|Date of Decision: February 25, 2014 Satish Kumar ... Appellant Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Yamuna Nagar ... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present:Mr. Sunisn Bindlish, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Yogesh Putney,Advocatefor the respondent. )))) AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant states that he hasinstructions to withdraw the appeal as the assessee-appellant seekspermission to file an application under Section 254(2) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 for rectification of the impugned order dated24.08.2011. He prays to withdraw the present appeal.| 2 The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however,be open to the appellant to take recourse to the remedies availableto him in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE February 25, 2014SUNI| (ANITA CHAUDHRY)JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.