In Satish Maheshwari v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, New Delhi, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 700/2017
SATISH MAHESHWARI ..... Appellant Through Mr. Inder Paul Bansal and Mr. Vivek Bansal, Advs.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI
..... Respondent
Through Mr. Ajit Sharma and Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 15.05.2018
The court is of the opinion that in the appeal question of remand does not press. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. All the pending application also stand disposed off.
All the contentions of the parties are kept open.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
MAY 15, 2018 rc
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue