Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Satya Narayana Ravela v. The Deputy Comm...

Satya Narayana Ravela v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle –

High Court 12 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Satya Narayana Ravela v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle –
Date of order
12 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-2017
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Satya Narayana Ravela v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle –, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: This writ petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.08.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.24186 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.25521 of 2021 and 2508 of 2024 Satya Narayana Ravela ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 1, Guntur, Income Tax Office, Lakshmipuram Main Road, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh – 522 006. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(4), 1[st] Floor, Investigation Building, No.46 (Old No.108), Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34. ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the 2[nd]respondent and quash the impugned order in W.P.No.24186 of 2021 ITBA/AST/S/153A/2021-22/1036088129(1) dated 30.09.2021 passed by the 2[nd] respondent as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sivaraman For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 30.09.2021 passed by the second respondent under Section 143(3) read with 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-2017. The impugned order has preceded a letter dated 20.09.2021 from the second respondent to the petitioner fixing the personal hearing on 23.09.2021 at 11.00 a.m. The petitioner has failed to take advantage of the same and has thus suffered the impugned Assessment order dated 30.09.2021. It is noticed that the time was granted to the petitioner was too short to the petitioner to responded meaningfully. 2. Therefore, this Court is of the view to meet the ends of justice, the impugned order can be set aside and the case may be remitted back to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis2/5 W.P.No.24186 of 2021 the respondents to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from today. The impugned order which stands quashed shall be treated as addendum to the Show Cause Notice issued under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 19.03.2021. It is expected that the petitioner will file reply within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. This writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.08.2024 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non-Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/Nojas To 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 1, Guntur, Income Tax Office, Lakshmipuram Main Road, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh – 522 006. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(4), 1[st] Floor, Investigation Building, No.46 (Old No.108), Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34. W.P.No.24186 of 2021 C.SARAVANAN, J.jas W.P.No.24186 of 2021and W.M.P.Nos.25521 of 2021 and 2508 of 2024 12.08.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan