Case Law › High Court › S.b. Civil Misc. Restoration Application...

S.b. Civil Misc. Restoration Application v. M/S. Kienzle India Samay Ltd

High Court 17 Mar 2011 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

17 Mar 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In S.b. Civil Misc. Restoration Application v. M/S. Kienzle India Samay Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature for RajasthanJaipur Bench, JaipurO R D E R S.B. Civil Misc. Restoration Application No.67/2011In S.B. Company Appeal No.3/2005Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3), Alwar Vs. M/s. Kienzle India Samay Ltd. Date Of Order :: 17/03/2011 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Ms. Parinitoo Jain, for applicant. Mr. Amod Kasliwal, for Official Liquidator. Application has been filed for recalling/restoration of the Company Appeal-3/05, which was dismissed in default by thisCourt vide order dt.08.08.2008. The restoration application has been filed within the period of limitation and thisCourt is satisfied with the explanationfurnished duly supported by the affidavit. Application is allowed. The orderstands recalled. The Company Appeal-3/2005 isrestored to its original number. Office toproceed. (Ajay Rastogi),J. VS Shekhawat/-p.167ResAppli11Mar17AlwFnl.doc

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.