S.b. Criminal Misc. Petition v. Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Circle I, Jodhpur
High Court
10 Jul 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
S.b. Criminal Misc. Petition v. Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Circle I, Jodhpur
Date of order
10 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In S.b. Criminal Misc. Petition v. Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Circle I, Jodhpur, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1835/2015Vinod Chhugani & Anr. Vs.
Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Circle I, Jodhpur
Date of order
:10.07.2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Mr. Vineet Jain for the petitioners.Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, Public Prosecutor.
After attempting to argue the matter onmerits for quite some time, learned counsel forthe petitioners seeks to withdraw this criminalmisc. petition for the purpose of raising allthe permissible defences before the trial courtat appropriate stage. However, learned counselfor the petitioners has prayed that a directionof issuance of standing arrest warrant againstthe petitioners may be modified and thepetitioners may be directed to summon throughbailable warrant.
This court is of the opinion that since thepetitioners are ready to appear before the trialcourt one opportunity can be given to them.
Hence, this criminal misc. petition isdismissed as withdrawn. However, the orderdated 3.11.2014 passed by Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offence),Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Case
No.876/2006 of issuance of standing arrestwarrant against the petitioners is modified.The petitioners shall appear before the trialcourt within a period of three weeks from todayand each of the petitioners shall furnish bailbonds to the tune of Rs.25,000/-. On furnishingthe same, the petitioners be released on bail.It is made clear that in case the petitionersfail to appear before the trial court as per theabove directions, the order dated 3.11.2014passed by the learned Magistrate willautomatically be revived.
,J.
Babulal/52
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.