S.b. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition v. State Of Rajasthan Through Pp Tijara, District Alwar, (Rajasthan
High Court
08 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
S.b. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition v. State Of Rajasthan Through Pp Tijara, District Alwar, (Rajasthan
Date of order
08 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In S.b. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition v. State Of Rajasthan Through Pp Tijara, District Alwar, (Rajasthan, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 479 / 2017
In
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1746/2017Asstt. Director Income Tax (Investigation) Income Tax Department, Alwar.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.State Of Rajasthan through PP Tijara, District Alwar, (Rajasthan).
2.Sapat Khan S/o Shri Yusuf Khan, by caste Mev, R/o Village Gadpur, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar (Rajasthan).
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Simlote for Mr. R.B. Mathur
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Meenakshi Pareek, PP
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Order
08/01/2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the applicationfor recalling the order dated 26.07.2017.
For the reasons stated before the Court by learned counsel,the application is allowed. The order dated 26.07.2017 is recalledand S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1746/2017 is restored to itsoriginal number.
List the misc. petition after two weeks, as prayed.
(DEEPAK MAHESHWARI) J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue