Sca/2760/1999 Of Arvind B Rana v. Income Tax Settlement Commissioner
High Court
03 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Sca/2760/1999 Of Arvind B Rana v. Income Tax Settlement Commissioner
Date of order
03 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Sca/2760/1999 Of Arvind B Rana v. Income Tax Settlement Commissioner, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The petition stands rejected as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2760 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/-
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI Sd/-
=========================================================
1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed ]to see the judgment? Noto see the judgment? No
2To be referred to the Reporter or not ? No
3[Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy ]of the judgment? Noof the judgment? No
Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the of law as to the interpretation of the 4constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder? Noconstitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder? No
5[Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ]? No? No
========================================================= ARVIND B RANA - Petitioner(s)Versus
INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER & 1 - Respondent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance :
MR JP SHAHfor Petitioner(s) : 1,MR MANISH J SHAH for Petitioner(s) : 1,SERVED BY RPAD - (R) for Respondent(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 2,
=========================================================
CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI
Date : 03/07/2008
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
SCA/2760/1999
Learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition, under instructions. Permission granted. The petition stands rejected as withdrawn. Rule discharged with no order as to costs.
Sd/-Sd/-
(D.A. Mehta, J.)
(H.B. Antani, J.)
M.M.BHATT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.