Case LawHigh Court › Sca/3320/2003 Of Rajeshkumar Rameshkumar...

Sca/3320/2003 Of Rajeshkumar Rameshkumar & Co v. Dy.director Of Income Tax(Inv)

High Court 19 Jun 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Sca/3320/2003 Of Rajeshkumar Rameshkumar & Co v. Dy.director Of Income Tax(Inv)
Date of order
19 Jun 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sca/3320/2003 Of Rajeshkumar Rameshkumar & Co v. Dy.director Of Income Tax(Inv), the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3316 of 2003With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8876 of 2003With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3318 of 2003With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3320 of 2003With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8859 of 2003With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8872 of 2003With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7144 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIHONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI ========================================= 1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see ]the judgment ?the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3[Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the ]judgment ?judgment ? Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as 4to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================= RAJESHKUMAR MAHENDRAKUMAR & CO. - Petitioner(s)Versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV) & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MRS SWATI SOPARKARfor Petitioner(s) : 1,MRS MAUNA M BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2.MR HRIDAY BUCH for Respondent(s) : 2,MR RAJU K KOTHARI for Respondent(s) : 2, ========================================= CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI and HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI Date : 19/06/2012 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned counsel for the petitioners stated, under instructions, that the cause does not survive. Disposed of, as not pressed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, vacated. [AKIL KURESHI, J.] [HARSHA DEVANI, J.] parmar*
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan