Case LawHigh Court › Sds Infracon Private Limited & Anr v. Ch...

Sds Infracon Private Limited & Anr v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds) Delhi & Anr

High Court 28 Oct 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Sds Infracon Private Limited & Anr v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds) Delhi & Anr
Date of order
28 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Sds Infracon Private Limited & Anr v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds) Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~92 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 689/2023 and CM Nos.2686/2023 & 62954/2024 SDS INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR......PetitionersThrough:Mr Bharat Beriwal and Mr AnkitSingh, Advocates. versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through:Mr Vipul Agrawal, SSC with MrGibran Naushad, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAO R D E R28.10.2024 % 1.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks to withdrawthe present petition as he states that new Guidelines dated 17.10.2024 havebeen issued for compounding of offences under the Income Tax Act, 1961.He submits that the petitioners intend to make an application under the newGuidelines and also seek adjustment of the amount paid. 2.The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3.It is clarified that if the petitioners are entitled to make an applicationunder the new Guidelines, this order would not preclude the petitioners fromdoing so. VIBHU BAKHRU, J OCTOBER 28, 2024 RK SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan