Sector 113 Gatevida Developersnpvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
18 Jan 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Sector 113 Gatevida Developersnpvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sector 113 Gatevida Developersnpvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~60
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 46/2024, CM APPLs 2972-74/2024
SECTOR 113 GATEVIDA DEVELOPERSNPVT LTD
..... Appellant
Through: Appearance not given
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Vipul Agarwal(Senior Standing Counsel) ,
Mr. Gibran Naushad (Junior Standing Counsel)
Ms. Sakashi Shairwal(Junior Standing Counsel) and
Mr. Gaorang Ranjan, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 18.01.2024
CM APPL 2972/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CM APPL 2973/2024 (Delay)
Bearing in the mind the disclosures made, the delay of 145 days
in filing the appeal is condoned.
The applications shall stand disposed of.
ITA 46/2024
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent draws our
attention to the fact that the Assessing Officer in the present case was seated in Gurugram in the State of Haryana and thus in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. ABC Papers Ltd. [(2022) 9 SCC 1], the instant appeal would not be maintainable.
Faced with the above, learned counsel for the appellant prayed for and is granted liberty to withdraw the instant appeal and to approach the jurisdictional High Court. Ordered accordingly.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
JANUARY 18, 2024neha
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.