Sector 34A, Chandigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
14 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Sector 34A, Chandigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
14 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sector 34A, Chandigarh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAATCHANDIGARH
LTA No.426 of 2015Date of decision:December 14, 2015
The Punjab State Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Limited,SCO No.153-155, Sector 34A, Chandigarh
...... Petiti
Commissioner of Income lax Il,Aaykar Bhawan, Sector 17,Chandigarh and another
S....deSponden
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEK AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICK RAMENDRA JAIN
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported 1n the Digest?
Present: Mr. M.R.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J.
Delay in refiling the appeal 1s condoned.
For orders, see ITA No.416 of 2015 (The Punjab State
Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Limited, SCO No.153-155,
Sector 34A, Chandigarh vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
I],Aaykar Bhawan, Sector 17, Chandigarh and another),
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)
Judge
December 14, 2015
(Ramendra Jain)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue