Case Law › High Court › Sekhar Kumar Mohapatra v. Mr. A. Kedia,...

Sekhar Kumar Mohapatra v. Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel For Revenue

High Court 12 Apr 2024 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

12 Apr 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sekhar Kumar Mohapatra v. Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel For Revenue, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No. 06 of 2024 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Khurda Sekhar Kumar Mohapatra ….. Vs. ….. Appellant Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel for Revenue Respondent CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER12.04.2024 ITA No. 06 of 2024 & I.A. No.03 of 2024 Order No.This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 01. 2. The condonation of delay application has been filed for condonation of delay of 1432 days in filing the ITA. 3. In view of the judgment passed by this Court in State of Orissa and another v. Bishnupriya Routray and another, 118 (2014) CLT 588, this Court is not inclined to condone the delay of 1432 days in filing the ITA. 4. Accordingly, the ITA and I.A. stand dismissed. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Priyajit (G. SATAPATHY) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Digitally SignedSigned by: PRIYAJIT SAHOODesignation: Jr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: HIGH COURT OF ORISSADate: 15-Apr-2024 18:33:20

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.