Services Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 14(1) & Ors.1
High Court
30 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Services Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 14(1) & Ors.1
Date of order
30 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Services Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 14(1) & Ors.1, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
PURTIPRASADPARAB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPARABDate: 2022.03.3116:08:42 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2022
Team Inerventure Export India Pvt. Ltd.
V/s.Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 1(3)(1), Mumbai and Ors.
….Petitioner
…Respondents
----
Mr. D.B. Shukla for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
N. R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED : 30[th] MARCH, 2022
P.C. :
1.In this case the notice issued under Section 148 of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 (the Act) is dated 20[th] April, 2021 but the procedure followedis the old procedure which came to be replaced by the Finance Act, 2021with effect from 1[st] April, 2021.
2.We have already held in Tata Communications Transformation
1
Services Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 14(1) & Ors.1
that such notices are bad in law and have to be quashed. Accordingly,notice impugned in this petition is hereby quashed and set aside.
3.Petition disposed accordingly.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1 Writ Petition No.1334 of 2021 dated 29[th] March, 2022.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue