Case LawHigh Court › Seth Shri Niwas Charity Trust v. Commiss...

Seth Shri Niwas Charity Trust v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur

High Court 12 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Seth Shri Niwas Charity Trust v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur
Date of order
12 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Seth Shri Niwas Charity Trust v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.The petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

[2025:RJ-JP:6235-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1606/2004 Seth Shri Niwas Charity Trust, through its trustee Shri MaheshKumar Kandoi, S/o Shri Radheshaym Kandoi aged about 48years, 36 Jai Jawan Colony, Scheme No.3, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Prakul Khurana with Mr.Akshay Sharma For Respondent(s): Mr.Sandeep Pathak HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR 12/02/2025 Order 1.This petition was filed in the year 2004 challenging the orderdated 05/06.02.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax,Jaipur II, Jaipur (for short ‘CIT’) rejecting the application forrenewal of exemption under Section 80G(5) of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). 2.The renewal of the exemption under Section 80G(5) of theAct was applied for a period of five years. During pendency of thepetition there was no interim protection in favour of the petitioner.With the efflux of time, the prayer for renewal has been renderedinfructuous. 3.The petition is disposed of as infructuous. 4.It is clarified that in case the petitioner applies for freshexemption or for subsequent renewal, the same shall be decided by the department in accordance with law without beinginfluenced by the observation made in the impugned order. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/1
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan