Case LawHigh Court › Sf v. Income Tax Officer

Sf v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 08 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Sf v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2023-24
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Sf v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: 7/10 With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 08.07.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.Nos.24671 & 24676 of 2025 & W.M.P.Nos.27816, 27817, 27819, 27810, 27811 & 27813 of 2025 W.P.No.24671 of 2025: M/s.Pavithran Aseptic Fruit Products,Rep. by its Authorized Signatory and Partner,Mr.E.Madhavan, Sf No.146/2, Jagadap Village, Jagadap Post,Kaveripattinam Via, Krishnagiri District 635112, Tamil Nadu, India ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, KRN Complex East, K Theatre Road, Krishnagiri 635 001. 2.The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, No.67-A, Race Course Road, Race Course, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore - 641 018. 3.The Bank manager, HDFC Bank, No 25-14 Ground Floor and 1st Floor, No 25-14 Ground Floor and 1st Floor, Rayakottai, Near Fly over Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri - 635 001, Tamil Nadu. 1/10 4.The Bank Manager, Lakshmi Vilas Bank (Now merged with DBS Bank India Pvt Ltd.), 88 C D, Bye Pass Road Dharmapuri - 636 701, Tamil Nadu. 5.Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent and quash the impugned notice issued under section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in DIN & Notice No ITBA/RCV/S/226(3)_1/2025-26/1077469209(1) dated 23.06.2025 in PANAAMFP0488M. W.P.No.24676 of 2025: M/s.Pavithran Aseptic Fruit Products,Rep. by its Authorized Signatory and Partner,Mr.E.Madhavan,Sf No.146/2, Jagadap Village, Jagadap Post,Kaveripattinam Via, Krishnagiri District 635112, Tamil Nadu, India ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, KRN Complex East, K Theatre Road, 2/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 Krishnagiri 635 001. 2.The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, No.67-A, Race Course Road, Race Course, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore - 641 018. 3.The Bank manager, HDFC Bank, No 25-14 Ground Floor and 1st Floor, Rayakottai, Near Fly over Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri - 635 001, Tamil Nadu. 4.The Bank Manager, Lakshmi Vilas Bank (Now merged with DBS Bank India Pvt Ltd.), 88 C D, Bye Pass Road Dharmapuri - 636 701, Tamil Nadu. 5.Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi.... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent and quash the impugned notice issued under section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in DIN & Notice No ITBA/RCV/S/226(3)_1/2025-26/1077468596(1) dated 23.06.2025 in PANAAMFP0488M. 3/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed challenging the impugned notices dated 23.06.2025 issued by the first respondent. 2. Ms.Sheela, learned Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.H.Siddarth, learned Junior Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1, 2 & 5 in all two writ petitions. By consent of the parties, these main writ petitions are taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner is engaged in production of fruit pulp from seasonal 4/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 3/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed challenging the impugned notices dated 23.06.2025 issued by the first respondent. 2. Ms.Sheela, learned Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.H.Siddarth, learned Junior Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1, 2 & 5 in all two writ petitions. By consent of the parties, these main writ petitions are taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner is engaged in production of fruit pulp from seasonal 4/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 fruit, especially Mango. This being the fact, the petitioner filed its return of income for the previous year relevant to the Assessment Year 2023-24, returning a total income of Rs.2,59,74,350/-, but the fifth respondent raised a demand of Rs.2,42,25,027/- Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on 28.03.2025, pending the said appeal, the first respondent issued a reminder letter dated 18.06.2025, requiring the petitioner to pay the demand immediately and granted time till 04.07.2024. However, the first respondent even before completion of the time granted by him, issued notices under Section 226(3) dated 23.06.2025 to the respondents 3 & 4, seeking to attach the bank accounts of the petitioner. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a stay petition before the Appellate Authority, seeking stay of entire demand, which was also pending. Hence, challenging those notices dated 23.06.2025, the petitioner has come forward with these writ petitions. 4. Further, she would submit that the attachment of petitioner's bank account severely impacted the petitioner's business. If the 5/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 attachment is not lifted, the petitioner will be put to great hardship. Further, she submitted that the petitioner is also willing to deposit 20% of the disputed tax amount to the first respondent in 10 equal monthly instalments. 5. On the other hand, the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 2 & 5 would submit that in the present case, the petitioner may be directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount, immediately. 6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 2 & 5 and also perused the materials available on record. 7. In the case on hand, it is evident that fifth respondent rasied a demand of Rs.2,42,25,027/-, against which an appeal was filed by the petitioner on 28.03.2025. The first respondent even before completion of the time granted by him, issued notices under Section 226(3) dated 6/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 23.06.2025 to the respondents 3 & 4, seeking to attach the bank accounts of the petitioner. Aggrieved over the same, these writ petitions have been filed. 8. Taking into consideration the nature of business carried out by the petitioner and his fair submission, this Court is inclined to pass the following order: (i) The order impugned herein is set aside on condition that the petitioner pays 20% of disputed tax amount to the first respondent in five (5) equal monthly instalments of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) each, on or before 18th of every month, commencing July 2025 till November 2025. (ii) Upon payment of the first instalment by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to instruct the concerned Bank to release the attachments and de-freeze the bank accounts of the petitioner. (iii) It is also made clear that if the petitioner fails to pay any one of the instalments, the attachment order passed by the first respondent shall stands restored. 7/10 With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. Speaking/Non-speaking orderIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / Novm 08.07.2025 (ii) Upon payment of the first instalment by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to instruct the concerned Bank to release the attachments and de-freeze the bank accounts of the petitioner. (iii) It is also made clear that if the petitioner fails to pay any one of the instalments, the attachment order passed by the first respondent shall stands restored. 7/10 With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. Speaking/Non-speaking orderIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / Novm 08.07.2025 Note: Issue order copy on 10.07.2025 To: 1.Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, KRN Complex East, K Theatre Road, Krishnagiri 635 001. 2.The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, No.67-A, Race Course Road, Race Course, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore - 641 018. 3.The Bank manager, HDFC Bank, No 25-14 Ground Floor and 1st Floor, Rayakottai, Near Fly over Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri - 635 001, Tamil Nadu. 8/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 4.The Bank Manager, Lakshmi Vilas Bank (Now merged with DBS Bank India Pvt Ltd.), 88 C D, Bye Pass Road Dharmapuri - 636 701, Tamil Nadu. 5.Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi. 9/10 10/10 W.P.Nos24671 & 24676 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,vm W.P.Nos.24671 & 24676 of 2025 & W.M.P.Nos.27816, 27817, 27819, 27810, 27811 & 27813 of 2025 08.07.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan