Case LawHigh Court › S.gian Singh Educational Society v. Chie...

S.gian Singh Educational Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh

High Court 09 Apr 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
S.gian Singh Educational Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh
Date of order
09 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In S.gian Singh Educational Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Chief Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula 2 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SAILESH RANJAN 2015.04.10 17:27 I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document CWP? No.4712 ofZ614 |Date of decision:0904.7015 S.Gian Singh Educational Society Versus — Petitioner Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh ...... Responden CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present:Mr.Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate, for the respondent. .... S.J.Vazifdar, Acting Chief Justice(Oral): 1,The parties have no objection to the writ petition being disposed ofin view of the order dated 25.03.2015 passed in CWP No. 747 of 2013 titledVivek Shiksha Samiti vs. Chief Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula 2 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned orders areset aside. The matter is remanded to the Commissioner of [Income ‘a(Exemptions) for passing a fresh decision in accordance with law includingconsidering the judgments of the Apex Court inCA No.5167 of 2008titled M/sQueen's Educational Society Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, |decided on16.03.2015. onAt present, there does not appear to be any reason to believe thatrecoveries will be made before the passing of the fresh order. The petitioner isalways at liberty to make an application before the concerned authority for a stay,if necessary. (S.J.Vazifdar)Acting Chief Justice (G.S.Sandhawalia)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan