Sh. Amarjit Singh v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I And Others
High Court
19 Dec 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Sh. Amarjit Singh v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I And Others
Date of order
19 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Sh. Amarjit Singh v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I And Others, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CHANDIGARH.
Civil Writ Petition No.3487 of 2004 Date of Decision: 19.12.2014
Sh. Amarjit Singh
..Petitioner
versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I and others
..Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S.WALIA
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents.
RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner is not present. The situationwas no different on 17.12.2014. It would also be appropriate tomention that four other similar writ petitions bearing nos.2846, 4221,4292 and 4348 of 2004 were dismissed for non-prosecution on5.11.2014, but no one has come forward to seek restoration.
Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
( RAJIVE BHALLA ) JUDGE JUDGE
19.12.2014VK
( B.S.WALIA ) JUDGE JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue