Sh. Jagmohan Gurbakshish Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Sh. Jagmohan Gurbakshish Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sh. Jagmohan Gurbakshish Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the petitioner: M/s.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.: 06 of 2018
Date of Decision: 12.03.2018
______________________________________________________________________
Sh. Jagmohan Gurbakshish Singh
…..Appellant.
Vs.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
…..Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the petitioner:
M/s. Sushant Keprate and Aditya Sood, Advocates, vice Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
For the respondent:
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice(Oral):
OMP(M) No. 05 of 2018
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, 13 days’ delay in filing the appeal, which in our considered view has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. Appeal be registered. Application stands disposed of.
ITA No. 06 of 2018
2. It has been stated by learned counsel for the appellant that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in ITA No. 20 of 2015, titled as M/s Stovekraft India Vs. Commissioner Income Tax and other connected matters, decided on
28[th] November, 2017 and prayed that this appeal be disposed of with the direction that the findings so returned by this Court in the judgment rendered in M/s Stovekraft India (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply to this appeal also.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of, with the direction that the findings returned by this Court in M/s Stovekraft India (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply to this appeal also and all directions so issued by this Court shall be construed as having been issued in this appeal also.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
March 12, 2018 (bhupender/guleria)
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.