Case LawHigh Court › Sh. Surinder Malik v. Assistant Commissi...

Sh. Surinder Malik v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 06 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Sh. Surinder Malik v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sh. Surinder Malik v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is allowed in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 1113/2017 and CM APPLS.44222-44223/2017 SH. SURINDER MALIK ..... Appellant Through Mr. Y.K. Kapur, Mr. A.K. Mehta and Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Advs. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 06.02.2018 Issue notice. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, ld. Sr. Standing Counsel accepts notice. With the consent of the ld. counsel for the parties, the appeal was heard finally. The assessee’s grievance is limited to the fact that Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remitted question as to verification of quantum, which it is entitled to claim deduction of 80IA(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). The findings recorded by the Authorities below i.e. CIT(A) and ITAT - after a remand order by the latter was that Section 80IA(8) was applicable. The CIT(A) rendered findings based upon all the relevant materials, which favoured the assessee. The ITAT was of the opinion that although, the appellant’s eligibility for the benefit of Section 80IA stood established, nevertheless the question of quantum of profits allowable is required to be re-considered and remitted the matter for fresh consideration to the Assessing Officer (AO). This Court, having regard to the circumstances, Assessment Year is 2006-07 and given that the matter had been remitted once previously, is of the opinion that the entire issue (upon which the remit has been directed) should be re-considered by the ITAT itself. If need be, it can obtain the necessary details from the AO, in accordance with law. The impugned order is accordingly modified. The ITAT is directed to consider for itself the issues that were remitted to the AO. The appeal is allowed in the above terms. All the pending applications also stand disposed off. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J FEBRUARY 06, 2018 rc A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan