Case LawHigh Court › Shah Nikhil Dhirajlal Huf Through Karta...

Shah Nikhil Dhirajlal Huf Through Karta Nikhil Shah v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5(2)(4

High Court 25 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Shah Nikhil Dhirajlal Huf Through Karta Nikhil Shah v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5(2)(4
Date of order
25 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Shah Nikhil Dhirajlal Huf Through Karta Nikhil Shah v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5(2)(4, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C/SCA/19330/2019 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19330 of 2019 ========================================================= = SHAH NIKHIL DHIRAJLAL HUF THROUGH KARTA NIKHIL SHAH Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5(2)(4) ========================================================== Appearance: MR. HARDIK V VORA(7123) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Respondent(s) No. 1==========================================================CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA andHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA Date : 25/01/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) We have heard Mr. Hardik Vora, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant and Mr. Manish Bhatt, the learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the Revenue. After arguing the matter for some time, Mr. Vora seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ application. This writ application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Notice is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. All the issues raised in this writ application are kept open to the Canvassing Officer at the time of reassessment proceedings. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) SUCHIT (ILESH J. VORA,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan