Shah Surendra And Associates v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(1), Jaipur Ncr Building, Statuecircle, Jaipur

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3527/2022 Shah Surendra And Associates, having its Office at 208,Anukampa-II, M.I. Road, Opp. Raymonds Showroom, Jaipur-302001 (Raj.) Through its Partner Surendra Shah. ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(1), Jaipur NCR Building, StatueCircle, Jaipur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya VijayFor Respondent(s): Mr. R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. withMr. Amit Malani HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND 04/03/2022 Judgment / Order Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counselfor the revenue at the outset would submit that the issue involvedin this petition is no longer res integra as it has been put to anend by the Division Bench of this Court in the decision renderedon 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batch ofpetitions) where the notices issued under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid andimpermissible in law and quashed. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel forboth the parties, the impugned notice issued in the present case,for the reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaid cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J Ritu/9