Shailash Moolrajani v. Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Division-5, Jaipur
High Court
05 May 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shailash Moolrajani v. Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Division-5, Jaipur
Date of order
05 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shailash Moolrajani v. Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Division-5, Jaipur, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: As prayed, present petition is dismissed as withdrawnwith liberty to the petitioners to file an application under Section311 Cr.P.C. in above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misccellaneous (Petition) No. 937/2018
1. Nanak Das Moolrajani, S/o Shri Rochiram Moolrajani, R/o92, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur.92, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur.
2. Neeraj Moolrajani, S/o Shri Ishwar Das Moolrajani, R/o92, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur.92, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur.
3. Umesh Moolrajani, S/o Shri Ishwar Das Moolrajani, R/o92, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur.92, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur.
4. Shailash Moolrajani, S/o Shri Rochiram Moolrajani, R/o92, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur.92, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Division-5, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. SS HoraFor Respondent(s): Mr. NS Dhakad PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Order
05/05/2018
The learned counsel for the petitioners has contendedthat due to lack of communication with the counsel, slips havingdeposited tax could not be brought on record and hence,application was filed for taking written statement of the accusedalongwith documents on record under Section 313 (5) Cr.P.C. Thelearned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that evendefence evidence has also been closed, therefore, petitioners areunable to prove that entire due tax was paid and no tax liabilitywas existing on the day complaint was filed qua non-payment oftax.
Let petitioner at first instance file an application underSection 311 Cr.P.C. stating reasons therein as to why production ofthe documents and leading evidence is necessary. Liberty is alsogranted to the petitioners to demonstrate before the trial courtthat lapse on the part of the petitioners should not be construed todeny justice to the petitioners.
As prayed, present petition is dismissed as withdrawnwith liberty to the petitioners to file an application under Section311 Cr.P.C. in above terms. Needless to say that in case such anapplication is filed within one week from receipt of certified copy ofthis order, the trial court shall decide the application by passing adetailed speaking order.
(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J
Mak/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.