Case LawHigh Court › Shakuntala Sales Incorporation v. Assist...

Shakuntala Sales Incorporation v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle – 43/Circle – 44, Kolkata & Ors

High Court 16 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Shakuntala Sales Incorporation v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle – 43/Circle – 44, Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
16 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Shakuntala Sales Incorporation v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Circle – 43/Circle – 44, Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

16.08.2022. p.b.Sl. No.10. W.P.A. 17644 of 2022 Shakuntala Sales Incorporation Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle – 43/Circle – 44, Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Mr. Binayak Gupta. ……..for the petitioner. Mr. Om Narayan Rai. ………for the respondents. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned assessment order dated 29[th] March, 2022 underSection 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to theassessment year 2017-18. The main ground of challengeby the petitioner against the impugned assessment orderdated 29[th] March, 2022 is that the same has been passedin total violation of principle of natural justice since beforepassing the aforesaid impugned assessment order all theformal notices were issued under the old surrendered PANbeing ABGFS 1657 Q and the surrendering of such oldPAN and the current PAN ABIFS 5263 L wascommunicated to the office of the respondent assessingofficer long back on 28[th] July, 2015. On perusal of therelevant record annexed to the writ petition, I find that thereturn relating to the relevant assessment year 2017-18was filed by the petitioner under the aforesaid new PAN which was allotted to the petitioner and in spite of that,the assessing officer concerned has passed the impugnedassessment order under the old PAN as appears at page 65of the writ petition. On a similar grievance relating to theassessment year 2015-16, the assessment against thepetitioner was dropped by the order dated 29[th] July, 2022. Considering the submission of the parties, and factsand circumstances as appears from record the impugnedorder dated 29[th] March, 2022 being Annexure P-10 to thewrit petition is quashed. However, quashing of theimpugned assessment order will not prevent therespondent assessing officer to initiate any freshproceeding and pass an order under Section 147 of the Actin accordance with law. With this observation and direction, this writpetition being WPA No.17644 of 2022 stands disposed of. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan