Shalimar Packaging Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 8(3)-I
High Court
18 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shalimar Packaging Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 8(3)-I
Date of order
18 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shalimar Packaging Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 8(3)-I, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal shall stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.319 OF 2009
Shalimar Packaging Pvt.Ltd.... Appellant.
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer, Ward 8(3)-I.
....Respondent.
.....
Mr.Samer G. Dalal for the Appellant.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Respondent.
......
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &
18[th] January, 2010.
P.C.:
The appeal was admitted on the following substantial
question of law :
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in holding that the depreciation with respect to the Daman Unit of the Appellant was to be compulsorily allowed and thrust upon while calculating profits for that unit?”
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Assessee states that the aforesaid questions are covered against the assessee by the
judgment of the Full Bench in Plastiblends India Ltd. vs. ACIT, (2009) 318 ITR 352. In view thereof, the question of law shall
stand answered against the assessee in terms of the judgment of
the Full Bench in the case of Plastiblends India (supra). The appeal shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.