Case LawHigh Court › Shamrao Vithal Co-Op.bank Ltd v. Income...

Shamrao Vithal Co-Op.bank Ltd v. Income Tax Commissioner & Ors

High Court 14 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shamrao Vithal Co-Op.bank Ltd v. Income Tax Commissioner & Ors
Date of order
14 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shamrao Vithal Co-Op.bank Ltd v. Income Tax Commissioner & Ors, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 2008 Shamrao Vithal Co-op.Bank Ltd....Petitioner vs. 1.Income Tax Commissioner & ors....Respondents. --- Mr.B.B.Saraf with Ms.Aparna i/b. M/s.V.Deshpande &Co., for Petitioner.Mr.B.M.Chatterjee, for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 14[th] August, 2008. P.C.:- 1.In this petition, the petitioner is makinggrievance against letter dated 13.5.2008 issued byIncome Tax officer-3(1)(2), Mumbai, a copy of whichis at “Exhibit L” to the petition. The learnedCounsel appearing for Income Tax Department, after taking instructions from the Income Tax officer whois present in the Court, states that the letterdated 13.5.2008 is withdrawn. The statement isaccepted. In view of the withdrawal of the letter,the petition becomes infructuous. The petition isdisposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan