Case LawHigh Court › Shankar Kashinath Kadam v. The Income Ta...

Shankar Kashinath Kadam v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Sangli & Ors

High Court 24 Nov 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Shankar Kashinath Kadam v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Sangli & Ors
Date of order
24 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Shankar Kashinath Kadam v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Sangli & Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

902.w12923.16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12923 OF 2016 Shankar Kashinath Kadam .. Petitioner. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Sangli & Ors... Respondents. Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar with Mr.Rohan Deshpande for the petitioner. CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA &A.K. MENON , JJ. P.C. : DATED : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2016 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the notice dated 4th January, 2016 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act'). The impugned notice seeks to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Mr.Naniwadekar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this petition with a liberty to urge the issue of jurisdiction before the Assessing Officer. 3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty as prayed is granted. (A.K. MENON,J.) (M. S. SANKLECHA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan