Sharad Kumarsri.p.amirtham v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxnon Corporate Circle-20(1)Room

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 17.07.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.Nos.29031 and 29094 of 2017and W.M.P.Nos.31271, 31348 & 31349 of 2017 Sharad KumarSri.P.Amirtham .. Petitioner in W.P.No.29031/2017 .. Petitioner in W.P.No.29094/2017 Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxNon Corporate Circle-20(1)Room No.311, 3[rd] Floor, Wanaparthy BlockAayakar Bhawan, 121 MG RoadChennai – 600 034. .. Respondent in both W.Ps' W.P.No.29031 of 2017 filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, seeking for a Writ of CertiorarifiedMandamus, calling for the records of the respondent containedin its impugned order F.No.AAICA 5949B/AY 2011-12/179(1)ACIT/NCC-20/Chennai dated 31.10.2017, passed by the respondentunder Section 179(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and to quashthe same as arbitrary, illegal and unfair, insofar as it holdsthe petitioner jointly and severally liable for the income taxarrears due from M/s.Anjugam Films Private Limited for theAssessment Year 2011-12 to the tune of Rs.37,34,73,563/- andto consequently forbear the respondent, or any other authorityor agent acting for or under it, from recovering any amountfrom the petitioner in respect of the income tax arrears duefrom M/s.Anjugam Films Private Limited for the AssessmentYears 2011-12. W.P.No.29094 of 2017 filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, tocall for the records of the respondent and quash the impugnedorder bearing F.No.AAICA5959B/AY 2011-12/179(1) ACIT/NCC-20/Chennai dated 31.10.2017.For PetitionerIn W.P.No.29031/2017: Mr.Suhrith ParthasarathyIn W.P.No.29094/2017: Mr.Sandeep BagmarFor Respondent : Mr.J.Narayanaswamy For Respondent (In both W.Ps')https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ COMMON ORDER Heard Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy, learned counselappearing for the petitioner in W.P.No.29031 of 2017,Mr.Sandeep Bagmar, learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner in W.P.No.29094 of 2017 and Mr.J.Narayanaswamy,learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the revenue hasproduced a communication sent to him by the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle-20, Chennai,dated 13.07.2018 and a copy of the proceedings of theAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle-20,Chennai, dated 13.07.2018. 3. From the above proceedings, it is seen that theimpugned orders in these writ petitions are withdrawn. 4. Thus, recording the stand taken by the respondentin the aforementioned communications, these writ petitions areclosed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneouspetitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsm To The Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxNon Corporate Circle-20(1)Room No.311, 3[rd] Floor, Wanaparthy BlockAayakar Bhawan, 121 MG RoadChennai – 600 034. +1 CC TO MR.ARUNKARTHIK MOHAN ADVOCATE SR.NO.47649 +2 CC TO MR.J.NARAYANASAMY,ADVOCATE SR.NO.47526 & 47527 +1 CC TO MR.SANDEEP BAGMAL, ADVOCATE SR.NO.46886. SVI(CO)ASK(02/08/2018) W.P.Nos.29031 and 29094 of 2017