Sharan Ramchandani v. Income Tax Officer -27(7) & Anr
High Court
17 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sharan Ramchandani v. Income Tax Officer -27(7) & Anr
Date of order
17 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Sharan Ramchandani v. Income Tax Officer -27(7) & Anr, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1066 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 512 OF 2007
Sharan Ramchandani.. Applicant
In the Matter Between
Sharan Ramchandani.. Appellant VsIncome Tax Officer -27(7) & Anr... Respondents
...................
Mr. K. Gopal a/w Mr. Tanmay Phadke & Ms. Neha Paranjpe for the Applicant
Ms. Padma Divakar for the Respondents
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 17, 2019.
P.C.:
1.This Motion has been taken for seeking early hearing ofIncome Tax Appeal No. 512 of 2007.
2.The reason for seeking an early hearing as made out inthe afÏdavit in support that the prosecution arising out ofsame cause has now reached an advanced stage before theCriminal Court. The early hearing and disposal of this appealwould assist the parties in knowing where they stand, whichwould assist them in the criminal proceedings.
3.In the above view, Notice of Motion is allowed in termsof prayer clause (a).
4.The appeal to be placed on final hearing board in the
week commencing from 4.2.2019.
[ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue