In Sharan Ramchandani v. The Income Tax Officer -3(1)(1) Mumbai And Another, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.513 OF 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3554 OF 2009
Sharan Ramchandani
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer -3(1)(1) Mumbai and another
..Appellant.
..Respondents.
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.514 OF 2010
IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.512 OF 2007
Sharan Ramchandani
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer -Ward 27(7), Mumbai and others
....
..Appellant.
..Respondents.
Mr. Jitendra Singh for the Appellant.Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Respondents.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C. :
2[nd] March, 2010.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant seeks on instructions to withdraw the Notices of Motion since it is stated that
the auction has already taken place. The Notices of Motion are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue