Case LawHigh Court › Sharda Agency, Through v. Kishore Variya...

Sharda Agency, Through v. Kishore Variyani

High Court 24 Oct 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Sharda Agency, Through v. Kishore Variyani
Date of order
24 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sharda Agency, Through v. Kishore Variyani, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, revision petition along with application, if any, stand dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1349/2023 1. Smt. Sarda Bhat W/o Shri Om Prakash Bhat, R/o Plot No.4, Vakil Colony, Somalpur Road, Chandra Bardai Nagar,Police Station Ramganj Ajmer4, Vakil Colony, Somalpur Road, Chandra Bardai Nagar,Police Station Ramganj Ajmer 2. Sharda Agency, Through Proprietor Smt. Sarda Bhat,Office Plot No. 4, Vakil Colony, Somalpur Road, ChandraBardai Nagar, AjmerOffice Plot No. 4, Vakil Colony, Somalpur Road, ChandraBardai Nagar, Ajmer ----Petitioners Versus 1. Kishore Variyani S/o Fatehchand Variyani, R/o 34 B,Income Tax Colony Vaishalinagar AjmerIncome Tax Colony Vaishalinagar Ajmer 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondents For Petitioner(s): Mr. Dilip SharmaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PPFor Respondent(s): Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/10/2024 Application No.01/2023 is filed for withdrawal of revisionpetition. Considered aforesaid. Accordingly, revision petition along with application, if any, stand dismissed as withdrawn. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan