In Sharma, Advs v. Badar Ahmed, J, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal.
Decision: The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn in the aforesaid circumstances.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$32 to 36
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CM 1127/2013 in ITA 1210/2010
CM 1123/2013 in ITA 1211/2010
CM 1125/2013 inITA 1212/2010
CM 1124/2013 in ITA 12 13/2010
• CM 1126/2013 in ITA 1223/2010
PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION Appellant Through Ms Shashi M Kapila and Mr Pravesh
Sharma, Advs.
versus
S [ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ][Respondent ]
Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR ORDER
% [22.01.2013 ]
These are applications for withdrawal of the appeal. The reasons for the withdrawal have been stated in the applications and they are primarily that the matter stands settled under the mutual agreement procedure under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between Indian authorities and the competent authorities in USA. The applications are allowed. The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn in the aforesaid circumstances.
JANUARY 22, 2013/vid
BADAR AHMED, j
6 W.044--% R.V.EASWAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue