Case LawHigh Court › Sharukh Khan v. The Income Tax Appellate...

Sharukh Khan v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal& Ors

High Court 02 Jul 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sharukh Khan v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal& Ors
Date of order
02 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sharukh Khan v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal& Ors, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Petition is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.1228 OF 2010 Sharukh Khan. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal& Ors....Respondents. .... Mr.Mandar Vaidya for the Petitioner.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. July 2, 2010. P.C. : The Petition seeks to challenge an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the Miscellaneous Application under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The only ground urged in support of the Petition at the hearing is that though Counsel appearing on behalf of the Assessee had cited the judgments in the case of Dr.M.K.E.Memon, 248 ITR 310 and Meera Ananda Nayak, 221 CTR 149, they have not been considered by the Tribunal, which constitutes a mistake apparent on the record. The Tribunal has observed that the judgments were distinguishable and in paragraph 5 of its decision has furnished reasons for holding thus. In this view of the matter, the order of the Tribunal in dismissing the application under Section 254 cannot be faulted. It is, however, clarified that this Court has had no occasion to decide the correctness of the view taken by the Tribunal and the assessee would be at liberty to espouse his remedies by filing an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which would be available against that decision. The Petition is accordingly dismissed. ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan