Case Law › High Court › Shashi Kant Goswami v. Union Of India

Shashi Kant Goswami v. Union Of India

High Court 07 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

07 Feb 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shashi Kant Goswami v. Union Of India, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.The review petition is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Writ Review No. 149 / 2017 Shashi Kant Goswami S/o Shri Chandra Kant Goswami, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 5E, 36 Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner- 334001. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Through the Finance Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi- 110001. 2. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Rani Bazar, Bikaner- 334001. 3. Zonal Accounts Officer, CBDT, B-Road, Paota, Jodhpur- 342010. 4. Administrative Officer (DDO), Income Tax Department, AayakarBhawan, Rani Bazar, Bikaner- 334001. ----Respondents _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : None present. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order 07/02/2018 1.Overlooking the defects not being removed we find that the point on which review is sought has been dealt with by thisCourt with reference to the decision of the Supreme Court andsuffice it to state if the view taken is wrong review is not theremedy. 2.The review petition is accordingly dismissed. (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J. (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG)CJ. Skant/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.