Case LawHigh Court › Shastri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai -600 020 v...

Shastri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai -600 020 v. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 1(1

High Court 11 Sep 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Shastri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai -600 020 v. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 1(1
Date of order
11 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Shastri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai -600 020 v. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 1(1, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the submissions and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 33485 of 2025 and WMP.Nos.37623 & 37624 of 2025 1. British Agro Products India P Ltd, Rep by its Managing Director, Dr. Akilan Ramnathan, No.9, State Bank Officers Colony, Shastri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai -600 020 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 1(1), Income Tax Department, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai-600 034 Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, other order or any other appropriate writ to quash the impugned Order dated 28.08.2025 bearing DIN No. ITBA/RCV/F/17/2025-26/1080126132(1) in PAN: for AY 2018-19, issued by the Respondent and consequently direct the Respondent not to initiate any recovery proceedings till the final appeal is dispose in line of application of Circular 530 of 1989. For Petitioner(s): For Respondent: Mr.M.Barathvaashan Mr.Avinash Krishnan RaviJunior Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 28.08.2025 issued by the respondent and for a consequential direction to the respondent not to initiate any recovery proceedings. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in a connected matter listed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 03.09.2025 in SLP(C) No.24001/2025 & SLP(C) No.24478 of 2025, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has granted stay of recovery proceedings and hence, he seeks to withdraw the present petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. 3. In view of the submissions and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 11-09-2025 kkn Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 1(1) Income Tax Department, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai-600 034 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J. KKN WP No. 33485 of 2025 11-09-2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan