Shelf Drilling International Inc v. Addl. Director Of Income Tax, International Taxation, Dehradun
High Court
27 Feb 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Shelf Drilling International Inc v. Addl. Director Of Income Tax, International Taxation, Dehradun
Date of order
27 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shelf Drilling International Inc v. Addl. Director Of Income Tax, International Taxation, Dehradun, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the appeal will stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Income Tax Appeal No. 1 of 2017
Shelf Drilling International Inc.
..………. Appellant
Versus
Addl. Director of Income Tax, International Taxation, Dehradun.
...………. Respondent
Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble K.M. Joseph, C.J.
Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.
Dated: 27[th] February, 2017
K.M. JOSEPH, C.J. (Oral)
Heard Mr. Pulak Raj Mullick, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. H.M. Bhatia, learned Brief Holder appearing for the State.
2. As far as Questions of Law Nos. (a) & (b) are concerned, after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we can safely take the view that they are covered against the appellant by virtue of the judgment rendered by this Court earlier in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc., reported in (2008) 300 ITR 265, as well as the judgment passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 50 of 2015 and connected matters. As far as Question of Law No. (c) is concerned, nothing is established before us to show that the findings of the Tribunal can be said to be perverse.
3. Consequently, the appeal will stand dismissed.
G
(V.K. Bist, J.) 27.02.2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.