In Sherla v. Ita.509.2017_34.Doc, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 2.In view thereof, this Appeal is dismissed as involving no taxeffect without entering into merits.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.509 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1
… Appellant
Vs
M/s.Sandstone Capital Advisors P. Ltd.… Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for Appellant
Mr.Upendra Lokegaonkar I/b Mint & Conferes for the Respondent
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATED: JULY 22, 2019
P.C.:
1.Learned Counsel for the parties are in agreement that thetax effect involved in the present appeal is below the minimumthreshold prescribed by CBDT in its latest Circular No.3 of 2018dated 11.7.2018.
2.In view thereof, this Appeal is dismissed as involving no taxeffect without entering into merits.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue