In Sherla v. Itxa.523.2017_2.Doc, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Income Tax Appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.523 OF 2017
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, Pune
Vs
Magarpatta Township Development & Construction Company Ltd.
… Appellant
… Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant Mr.Mandar Vaidya for the Respondent
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 5, 2019
P.C.:
1.Learned Counsel Shri Suresh Kumar for the appellant –Income Tax Department stated that in view of the Circular of theCBDT bearing No.16 of 2017 dated 25.4.2017, he does not pressthis appeal.
2.Income Tax Appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue