In Sherla v. Wp.1713.2019_13.Doc, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: DATED: AUGUST 5, 2019 P.C.: No one is present for the petitioner, when called out.Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1713 OF 2019
Risa International Limited
… Petitioner
VsPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax… RespondentsCentral 14, Mumbai
None present for the PetitionerMr.Suresh Kumar for Respondent
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 5, 2019
P.C.:
No one is present for the petitioner, when called out.Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.