Shilpi Pokharna v. Union Of India
High Court
24 Apr 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Shilpi Pokharna v. Union Of India
Date of order
24 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shilpi Pokharna v. Union Of India, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, the writ petition are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7012/2019
Shilpi Pokharna D/o Shri Sudhir Kumar Pokharna, Age 36 Years,R/o 1-A-28, Near Income Tax Office, Shastri Nagar, Bhilwara.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry OfCorporate Affairs, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, RajendraPrasad Road, New Delhi.Corporate Affairs, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, RajendraPrasad Road, New Delhi.
2. Registrar Of Companies, G/6-7, Second Floor, ResidencyArea, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan.Area, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7024/2019
Dinesh Gokhru S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Gokhru, Age 65 Years, R/oHouse No. 2-F-14, New Housing Board, Shastri Nagar, Bhilwara.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry OfCorporate Affairs, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, RajendraPrasad Road, New Delhi. Delhi 110001Corporate Affairs, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, RajendraPrasad Road, New Delhi. Delhi 110001
2. Registrar Of Companies, G/6-7, Second Floor, ResidencyArea, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan.Area, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranav Bhardwaj for
Mr. Sanjay Nahar
Mr. Pushkar Temny
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Deepak Bishnoi
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
24/04/2023
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writpetitions have become infructuous.
2.Accordingly, the writ petition are dismissed as having
become infructuous.
3.Stay petitions also stands disposed of.
113-114-amit/-
(DR.NUPUR BHATI),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.