Shiv Raj Singh Bawa v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Amritsar
High Court
03 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Shiv Raj Singh Bawa v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Amritsar
Date of order
03 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Shiv Raj Singh Bawa v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Amritsar, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 3In the circumstances, we dismiss the appeal at this stagegiving liberty to the appellant to approach the authorities under the saidscheme and, if necessary to revive the present appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.103
ITA No.391 of 2019 (O&M)Date of Decision : 03.03.2020
Shiv Raj Singh Bawa
...... Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Amritsar...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MR.JUSTICEAVNEESH JHINGAN
---
Present ;Mr. Jorawar Singh Bhasin, Advocatefor the appellant.---
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
inThis appeal has been filed against the order passed by theTribunal dated 30.01.2019.
2 Counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions thatthe appellant wishes to take recourse to the Scheme recently announcednamely Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme but the only fly in the ointment is thatthe said scheme has yet to receive the assent of the President of India.
3In the circumstances, we dismiss the appeal at this stagegiving liberty to the appellant to approach the authorities under the saidscheme and, if necessary to revive the present appeal. However, it isclarified that for the purpose of the said scheme, the appeal would bedeemed to be pending.
ITA No.391 of 2019 (O&M)
4Since the main case has been decided, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands disposed of. |
(AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE
March 03, 2020ashish
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable |
( AVNEESH JHINGANJUDGE
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.