Shivshankar Singh And Others v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 23(1) And Another
High Court
20 Mar 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shivshankar Singh And Others v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 23(1) And Another
Date of order
20 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shivshankar Singh And Others v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 23(1) And Another, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO.718 OF 2013
Shivshankar Singh and othersversusAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 23(1) and another
.....
Ms. A. Vissanji with Mr. S.J. Mehta for the Petitioners.Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Respondents.
.....
..Petitioners.
..Respondents.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANDA.A. SAYED, JJ.
20 March 2013.
P.C. :
Rule. By consent taken up for final hearing. Counsel for the Respondents waives service.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue state that this Petition would be governed by the judgment delivered today in companion Writ Petition (Lodg) 717 of 2013. For the reasons indicated by the Court while allowing the companion Petition, rule is made absolute by setting aside the notice dated 28 March 2012 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act purporting to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2008-09.
There shall be no order as to costs.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.