Case LawHigh Court › Sh.kuldeepraichawla v. Deputy Commission...

Sh.kuldeepraichawla v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-5 &Ors

High Court 20 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Sh.kuldeepraichawla v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-5 &Ors
Date of order
20 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Sh.kuldeepraichawla v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-5 &Ors, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$-8 to 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2922/2020, CM APPL. Nos. 10157/2020 & 10158/2020 + SH.KULDEEPRAICHAWLA ThroughMr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocatewith A4r. Kirti Uppal, SeniorAdvocate along with Ms. Kavita Jha,Mr. Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr. UditNaresh, Advocates.with A4r. Kirti Uppal, SeniorAdvocate along with Ms. Kavita Jha,Mr. Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr. UditNaresh, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5 &ORS. Respondents Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior StandingCounsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra,Standing Counsel along with Ms.Madhura M.N., Advocate and Mr.Naveen Kumar, DCIT, Central Circle-5.Counsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra,Standing Counsel along with Ms.Madhura M.N., Advocate and Mr.Naveen Kumar, DCIT, Central Circle-5. 9+W.P.(C) 2923/2020, CM APPL. Nos. 10162/2020 & 10163/2020SMT. NAMRATA CHAWLA PetitionerThrough Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocatewith Mr. Kirti Uppal, SeniorAdvocate along with Ms. Kavita Jha,Mr. Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr. UditNaresh, Advocates.+W.P.(C) 2923/2020, CM APPL. Nos. 10162/2020 & 10163/2020SMT. NAMRATA CHAWLA PetitionerThrough Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocatewith Mr. Kirti Uppal, SeniorAdvocate along with Ms. Kavita Jha,Mr. Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr. UditNaresh, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5 &ORS.Respondents Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior StandingCounsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra,Standing Counsel along with Ms.Madhura M.N., Advocate and Mr.Naveen Kumar, DCIT, Central Circle-5. 10+W.P.(C) 2925/2020, CM APPL. Nos. 10166/2020 & 10167/2020SH.AMANVEER SINGH petiWrThrough Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocatewith Mr. Kirti Uppal, SeniorAdvocate along with Ms. Kavita Jha,Mr. Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr. UditNaresh, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5 &ORS.RespondentsThrough Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior Standing.Counsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra,Standing Counsel along with Ms.Madhura M.N., Advocate and Mr.Naveen Kumar, DCIT, Central Circle-5. 11+W.P.(C) 2926/2020, CM APPL. Nos. 10169/2020 & 10170/2020SMT. NAMRATA CHAWLA PetitionerThrough Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocatewith Mr. Kirti Uppal, SeniorAdvocate along with Ms. Kavita Jha,Mr. Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr. UditNaresh, Advocates.versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5 &ORS. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS. Naresh, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS. Respondents Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior StandingCounsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra,Standing Counsel along with Ms.Madhura M.N., Advocate and Mr.Naveen Kumar, DCIT, Central Circle-5.Counsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra,Standing Counsel along with Ms.Madhura M.N., Advocate and Mr.Naveen Kumar, DCIT, Central Circle-5. CORAM: VHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER20.03.2020 % Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, the present writ petitions are disposed of with the followingdirections (a) The Principal Commissioner, Income Tax Department, shalldecide the review petitions, filed on behalf of the petitionersherein, after affording the latter an opportunity of being heard, byway of a speaking order within a period of four weeks from today.decide the review petitions, filed on behalf of the petitionersherein, after affording the latter an opportunity of being heard, byway of a speaking order within a period of four weeks from today. (b) The Income Tax Department shall not enforce the decision takenon the petitioners' review petitions, if they are adverse to the latter,for two weeks, after supplying them with copies thereof.on the petitioners' review petitions, if they are adverse to the latter,for two weeks, after supplying them with copies thereof. (a) The Principal Commissioner, Income Tax Department, shalldecide the review petitions, filed on behalf of the petitionersherein, after affording the latter an opportunity of being heard, byway of a speaking order within a period of four weeks from today.decide the review petitions, filed on behalf of the petitionersherein, after affording the latter an opportunity of being heard, byway of a speaking order within a period of four weeks from today. (b) The Income Tax Department shall not enforce the decision takenon the petitioners' review petitions, if they are adverse to the latter,for two weeks, after supplying them with copies thereof.on the petitioners' review petitions, if they are adverse to the latter,for two weeks, after supplying them with copies thereof. (c) The petitioners shall file an undertaking before this Court within aperiod of two working days, to the effect that they will not alienatethe movable or immovable assets upto Rs.lO crores, in themeantime.period of two working days, to the effect that they will not alienatethe movable or immovable assets upto Rs.lO crores, in themeantime. With the above directions, the present petitions are disposed of accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of. A copy of this Order be given dasti under signature of CourtMaster to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. l'\n.SIDBHARTH MRIDUL, MARCH 20, 2020 as
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan