Shourya Estates Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(2) New Delhi & Anr
High Court
04 Dec 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Shourya Estates Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(2) New Delhi & Anr
Date of order
04 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shourya Estates Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(2) New Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 6.Accordingly, the prayers made in the writ petition are allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment Reserved on: 03.08.2023 Judgment Pronounced on: 04.12.2023
+ W.P.(C) 13049/2018
SHOURYA ESTATES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Ruchesh Sinha, Adv. versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 23(2) NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Vipul Agrawal, Sr Standing Counsel, with Mr Gibran Naushad and Ms Sakshi Shairwal, Standing Counsels.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.:
1.This writ petition concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12.
2.Via this writ petition, the petitioner, i.e., Shourya Estates Pvt. Ltd. [hereafter referred to as "SEPL"], seeks the following directions: (i) Quash notice dated 31.03.2018 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, “Act”].
(ii) Quash the order dated 26.11.2018 whereby objections filed by SEPL concerning reopening its assessment were rejected.
3.We may note that learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue involved in the instant case is similar to that which obtains in W.P.(C)No.12709/2018, concerning SEPL’s sister concern, Shourya
W.P.(C)No.13049/2018 Page 1 of 2
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
4.We have quashed the order, rejecting the objections for the reasons outlined in the judgment in the aforementioned case. outlined in the judgment in the aforementioned case.
5.According to us, this writ petition will follow the same course.
6.Accordingly, the prayers made in the writ petition are allowed.
7.Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the judgment.
(RAJIV SHAKDHER)
JUDGE
(ANISH DAYAL)
JUDGE
DECEMBER 4, 2023
W.P.(C)No.13049/2018 Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.