Case LawHigh Court › Showa Corporation v. Deputy Director Of...

Showa Corporation v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Internationaltaxation) Circle 3(2), New Delhi

High Court 01 Dec 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Showa Corporation v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Internationaltaxation) Circle 3(2), New Delhi
Date of order
01 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Showa Corporation v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Internationaltaxation) Circle 3(2), New Delhi, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~14 & 15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.(C) 2699/2014+W.P.(C) 4383/2014 SHOWA CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION) CIRCLE 3(2), NEW DELHI..... Respondent ..... RespondentThrough :Mr. Rahul Kaushik, SSC for IncomeTax Department. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHO R D E R%01.12.2017CM APPL. 43561/2017 in W.P.(C) 2699/2014CM APPL. 43560/2017 in W.P.(C) 4383/2014 Issuenoticetononapplicant-respondent,returnableon20[th]December, 2017. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, learned Senior Standing Counsel fornon-applicant/respondent accepts notice.Copy of the order sheets of the Tribunal will be sent by the Counselfor the Revenue to the Central Board of Direct Taxes, and if the Boarddeemsappropriate,necessarydirectionswouldbeissuedtotheDepartmental Representative. Learned counsel for the respondent would obtain instructions andascertain details of departmental representative, who would argue the matter W.P.(C) Nos. 2699/2014 & 4383/2014 before the Tribunal. It will be ensured that the departmental representativedoes not take adjournment. Contention of the applicant-petitioner is that the tax amount involvedis substantial and the issues, subject matter of examination before theTribunal are re-occurring. It will also be the duty of the applicant-petitioneralso not to take an adjournment. Relist on 20[th]December, 2017. A copy of the order be given dasti under signature of Court Master. SANJIV KHANNA, J DECEMBER 01, 2017j PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J W.P.(C) Nos. 2699/2014 & 4383/2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan