Case LawHigh Court › Shree Bade Mathuresh Ji Temple Board v....

Shree Bade Mathuresh Ji Temple Board v. Income-Tax Officer & Ors

High Court 09 Sep 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shree Bade Mathuresh Ji Temple Board v. Income-Tax Officer & Ors
Date of order
09 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shree Bade Mathuresh Ji Temple Board v. Income-Tax Officer & Ors, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3532/2013 Shree Bade Mathuresh Ji Temple BoardVersusIncome-Tax Officer & Ors. Date of Order: 09/09/2014 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI None present for the petitioner. Mr. Snhas Dabade-OIC-ACIT, Kota, present in person. It is stated that after the notice under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, re-assessment of the accounting year 2006-07 has already been made followed by an appeal by theassessee. The writ petition has thus become infructuous forchallenge to the notice under Section 148 of the Act. Theissue involved therein is otherwise pending before theDivision Bench in regard to the subsequent assessment yearof 2008-09. In view of the facts given by the respondent and asnone appears for the petitioner thus, writ petition is dismissedas rendered infructuous after re-assessment in pursuance tothe impugned notice and thereupon appeal has also beenpreferred. It is however, with the liberty to the petitioner that ifanything survives in the writ petition, make an application for its revival. This disposes of the stay application also. (M.N. BHANDARI), J. S.R. Kumawat, Jr. P.A.All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in thejudgment/order being emailed. Seva Ram Kumawat Jr.P.A.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan