Shree Bade Mathuresh Ji Temple Board v. Income-Tax Officer & Ors
High Court
12 Sep 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shree Bade Mathuresh Ji Temple Board v. Income-Tax Officer & Ors
Date of order
12 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shree Bade Mathuresh Ji Temple Board v. Income-Tax Officer & Ors, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3533/2013
Shree Bade Mathuresh ji Temple Board
Versus
Income-Tax Officer & Ors.
DATE OF ORDER : 12/09/2014
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI
None present for petitionerMr. Kamlesh Meena – OIC for respondent-Income Tax department,present in person.
***
It is stated that after the notice under Section 148 of the
Income Tax Act, re-assessment of the accounting year 2006-07 hasalready been made followed by an appeal by the assessee. The writpetition has thus become infructuous for challenge to the noticeunder Section 148 of the Act. The issue involved therein is otherwisepending before the Division Bench in regard to the subsequentassessment year of 2008-09.
In view of the facts given by the respondent and as noneappears for the petitioner thus, writ petition is dismissed as renderedinfructuous after re-assessment in pursuance to the impugned noticeand thereupon appeal has also been preferred. It is however, withthe liberty to the petitioner that if anything survives in the writ petition,make an application for its revival.
This disposes of the stay application also.
[M.N.BHANDARI], J.
“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/orderbeing emailed.”
FATEH RAJ BOHRA, Sr. P.A.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.