Case LawHigh Court › Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd v. Joint...

Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd v. Joint Cit

High Court 01 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd v. Joint Cit
Date of order
01 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd v. Joint Cit, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2681 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2681 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2681 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.88 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.88 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.88 OF 2004 Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd. .. Appellant Vs. Joint CIT .. Respondent Mr.Girish Rao i/by M/s.Lex Consultus for the Appellant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 1st August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking to recall our order dated 28th July, 2008 whereby the Appeal was dismissed in default. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for recalling our order dated 28th July, 2008. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on board for final hearing on 21.8.2008. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan