Shree Devdatta Chandrakant Patil … v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
High Court
27 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Shree Devdatta Chandrakant Patil … v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
27 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Shree Devdatta Chandrakant Patil … v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: Only on this ground, we decline to entertain this Petition and the same is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.11540 OF 2017
Shree Devdatta Chandrakant Patil… Petitioner Vs.Income Tax Officer, Ward No.4 and Ors.… Respondents
… Respondents
Mr. Devdatta Chandrakant Patil Petitioner in person.Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 27[th ]NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.
1The petitioner seeks to appear in person. However, in view of the report submitted by the Committee of Registrars, he cannot appear in person.
2The challenge in this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 17[th] May, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Mumbai in an Appeal preferred by the petitioner. The remedy of filing statutory Appeal before this Court is available to the petitioner. Only on this ground, we decline to entertain this Petition and the same is disposed of. However, it will be open for the petitioner to prefer an Appeal against the impugned judgment and order. All contentions on merits are kept open.
(A.K. MENON, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.